Never Again Shall a Single Story Be Told as Though It Were the Only One

Westwardriters imagine that they cull stories from the globe.  I'grand beginning to believe that vanity makes them think and so.  That information technology'south actually the other way effectually.  Stories cull writers from the world.  Stories reveal themselves to united states of america.  The public narrative, the private narrative -- they colonize u.s..  They commission the states.  They insist on being told.  Fiction and non-fiction are just different techniques of story telling.  For reasons I do not fully understand, fiction dances out of me.  Not-fiction is wrenched out by the aching, broken world I wake up to every morning.

The theme of much of what I write, fiction as well every bit not-fiction, is the relationship between power and powerlessness and the endless, circular conflict they're engaged in.  John Berger, that most wonderful author, once wrote: 'Never again will a single story be told every bit though information technology's the but one'.  There can never be a single story.  At that place are just ways of seeing.  So when I tell a story, I tell it non as an ideologue who wants to pit one absolutist ideology confronting another, only as a story-teller who wants to share her fashion of seeing.  Though it might appear otherwise, my writing is not really about nations and histories, it'south nigh power.  Most the paranoia and ruthlessness of ability.  About the physics of ability.  I believe that the accumulation of vast unfettered ability past a Land or a state, a corporation or an institution -- or fifty-fifty an individual, a spouse, friend or sibling -- regardless of credo, results in excesses such as the ones I will recount here.

Living as I exercise, as millions of us do, in the shadow of the nuclear holocaust that the governments of India and Pakistan keep promising their brain-washed denizens, and in the global neighbourhood of the State of war against Terror (what President Bush-league rather biblically calls 'The Task That Never Ends'), I find myself thinking a great deal about the relationship betwixt citizens and the state.

In Bharat, those of us who take expressed views on nuclear bombs, big dams, corporate globalization and the rise threat of communal Hindu fascism -- views that are at variance with the Indian regime's -- are branded 'anti-national'.  While this accusation does non fill me with indignation, it'due south non an accurate description of what I practise or how I call back.  An 'anti-national' is a person is who is against his/her own nation and, past inference, is pro another one.  But it isn't necessary to be 'anti-national' to be deeply suspicious of all nationalism, to be anti-nationalism.  Nationalism of one kind or some other was the cause of most of the genocide of the 20th century.  Flags are $.25 of coloured material that governments use first to compress-wrap people's minds and so as ceremonial shrouds to coffin the dead.  When contained, thinking people (and here I do not include the corporate media) begin to rally nether flags, when writers, painters, musicians, moving-picture show makers suspend their judgment and blindly yoke their art to the service of the 'nation', it'south fourth dimension for all of the states to sit upward and worry.  In India we saw it happen shortly after the nuclear tests in 1998 and during the Kargil war against Pakistan in 1999.  In the US we saw it during the Gulf war and we see information technology at present, during the 'War confronting Terror'.  That blizzard of fabricated-in-Prc American flags.

Recently, those who have criticized the actions of the The states regime (myself included) have been called 'anti-American'.  Anti-Americanism is in the process of existence consecrated into an ideology.

The term 'anti-American' is usually used by the American establishment to discredit and, non falsely -- only shall nosotros say inaccurately -- ascertain its critics.  One time someone is branded anti-American, the chances are that he or she will be judged earlier they're heard and the argument volition exist lost in the welter of bruised national pride.

What does the term 'anti-American' mean?  Does it mean you lot're anti-jazz?  Or that you're opposed to free spoken communication?  That you don't delight in Toni Morrison or John Updike?  That yous take a quarrel with giant sequoias?  Does it mean you don't admire the hundreds of thousands of American citizens who marched against nuclear weapons, or the thousands of war resisters who forced their government to withdraw from Vietnam?  Does information technology mean that yous hate all Americans?

This sly conflation of America's civilization, music, literature, the scenic concrete beauty of the country, the ordinary pleasures of ordinary people with criticism of the U.s.a. government'due south strange policy (about which, thanks to America's 'gratis press', sadly nigh Americans know very little) is a deliberate and extremely effective strategy.  It's like a retreating army taking cover in a heavily populated city, hoping that the prospect of hitting civilian targets volition deter enemy fire.

In that location are many Americans who would be mortified to exist associated with their authorities'southward policies.  The nearly scholarly, scathing, incisive, hilarious critiques of the hypocrisy and the contradictions in US government policy come from American citizens.  When the rest of the world wants to know what the US government is up to, nosotros plow to Noam Chomsky, Edward Said, Howard Zinn, Ed Herman, Amy Goodman, Michael Albert, Chalmers Johnson, William Blum and Anthony Arnove to tell usa what'southward really going on.

Similarly, in India, not hundreds, only millions of us would exist ashamed and offended if we were in any mode implicated with the present Indian authorities's fascist policies which, apart from the perpetration of state terrorism in the valley of Kashmir (in the name of fighting terrorism), accept also turned a blind eye to the recent state-supervised pogrom confronting Muslims in Gujarat.  Information technology would be absurd to think that those who criticise the Indian government are 'anti-Indian' -- although the government itself never hesitates to take that line.  It is dangerous to sacrifice to the Indian government or the American government or anyone for that thing, the correct to ascertain what 'India' or 'America' are, or ought to be.

To call someone 'anti-American', indeed, to be anti-American, (or for that thing anti-Indian, or anti- Timbuktuan) is not just racist, it's a failure of the imagination.  An inability to see the globe in terms other than those that the institution has prepare out for yous: If you're not a Bushie you're a Taliban.  If you don't love us, you detest us.  If you lot're non good you lot're evil.  If you're not with usa, you're with the terrorists.

Concluding year, like many others, I too made the fault of scoffing at this mail- September eleven rhetoric, dismissing information technology as foolish and arrogant.  I've realized that information technology's not foolish at all.  It'due south actually a canny recruitment drive for a misconceived, dangerous state of war.  Every mean solar day I'm taken ashamed at how many people believe that opposing the war in Transitional islamic state of afghanistan amounts to supporting terrorism, or voting for the Taliban.  At present that the initial aim of the war -- capturing Osama bin Laden (dead or live) -- seems to accept run into bad weather condition, the goalposts have been moved.  Information technology'southward being fabricated out that the whole point of the state of war was to topple the Taliban regime and liberate Afghan women from their burqas.  We're being asked to believe that the US marines are actually on a feminist mission. (If so, will their adjacent cease be America'due south military marry Kingdom of saudi arabia?)  Recall of it this way: In India there are some pretty reprehensible social practices, against 'untouchables', against Christians and Muslims, against women.  Pakistan and Bangladesh have even worse means of dealing with minority communities and women.  Should they exist bombed?  Should Delhi, Islamabad, and Dhaka exist destroyed?  Is information technology possible to bomb bigotry out of India?  Can we bomb our way to a feminist paradise?  Is that how women won the vote in the US?  Or how slavery was abolished?  Can we win redress for the genocide of the millions of native Americans upon whose corpses the US was founded by bombing Santa Fe?

None of u.s.a. demand anniversaries to remind the states of what we cannot forget.  And so information technology is no more than coincidence that I happen to be hither, on American soil, in September -- this month of dreadful anniversaries.  Uppermost on everybody's mind of grade, particularly here in America, is the horror of what has come to exist known equally 9/11.  Nearly three chiliad civilians lost their lives in that lethal terrorist strike.  The grief is still deep.  The rage still sharp.  The tears accept not dried.  And a strange, mortiferous war is raging around the world.  Yet, each person who has lost a loved 1 surely knows secretly, deeply, that no state of war, no human activity of revenge, no daisy-cutters dropped on someone else'southward loved ones or someone else'due south children will blunt the edges of their pain or bring their ain loved ones back.  State of war cannot avenge those who have died.  War is just a brutal desecration of their memory.

To fuel yet another state of war -- this time against Republic of iraq -- by cynically manipulating people's grief, by packaging information technology for TV specials sponsored by corporations selling detergent or running shoes, is to devalue and devalue grief, to drain it of meaning.  What we are seeing at present is a vulgar brandish of the business of grief, the commerce of grief, the pillaging of fifty-fifty the about private human feelings for political purpose.  It is a terrible, vehement thing for a state to do to its people.

Information technology's not a clever-enough subject to speak of from a public platform, but what I would really dear to talk to you near is loss.  Loss and losing.  Grief, failure, brokenness, numbness, doubt, fear, the expiry of feeling, the decease of dreaming.  The absolute, relentless, endless, habitual unfairness of the world.  What does loss means to individuals?  What does it means to whole cultures, whole peoples who have learned to alive with information technology every bit a abiding companion?

Since it is September 11 that we're talking about, perhaps it's in the fitness of things that we call up what that engagement means, not only to those who lost their loved ones in America terminal year, simply to those in other parts of the world to whom that appointment has long held significance.  This historical dredging is not offered as an accusation or a provocation.  Simply just to share the grief of history.  To thin the mist a footling.  To say to the citizens of America, in the gentlest, most man manner: welcome to the world.

Twenty-nine years ago, in Republic of chile, on the September xi, 1973, General Pinochet overthrew the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in a CIA-backed coup.  'Chile shouldn't be immune to go Marxist just considering its people are irresponsible', said Henry Kissinger, so President Nixon's national security adviser.

After the coup President Allende was found dead inside the presidential palace.  Whether he was killed or whether he killed himself, we'll never know.  In the government of terror that ensued, thousands of people were killed.  Many more simply 'disappeared'.  Firing squads conducted public executions.  Concentration camps and torture chambers were opened across the country.  The dead were buried in mine shafts and unmarked graves.  For 17 years the people of Chile lived in dread of the midnight knock, of routine 'disappearances', of sudden arrest and torture.  Chileans tell the story of how the musician Victor Jara had his hands cutting off in front of a crowd in the Santiago stadium.  Before they shot him, Pinochet's soldiers threw his guitar at him and mockingly ordered him to play.

In 1999, post-obit the arrest of General Pinochet in Uk, thousands of cloak-and-dagger documents were declassified by the Us government.  They incorporate unequivocal show of the CIA's involvement in the insurrection as well as the fact that the U.s.a. government had detailed information about the state of affairs in Chile during General Pinochet's reign.  Yet Kissinger bodacious the general of his support: 'In the Usa as you know, we are sympathetic to what y'all are trying to practice', he said, 'Nosotros wish your authorities well'.

Those of us who have only ever known life in a republic, all the same flawed, would find it hard to imagine what living in a dictatorship and enduring the absolute loss of freedom really means.  It isn't just those who Pinochet murdered, but the lives he stole from the living that must be deemed for, too.

Sadly, Chile was not the just land in South America to exist singled out for the United states authorities's attentions.  Guatemala, Costa rica, Ecuador, Brazil, Peru, the Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Honduras, Panama, Republic of el salvador, Republic of peru, Mexico and Colombia; they've all been the playground for covert -- and overt -- operations by the CIA.  Hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans have been killed, tortured or have simply disappeared nether the despotic regimes and tin-pot dictators, drug runners and arms dealers that were propped upwardly in their countries.  (Many of them learned their arts and crafts in the infamous The states government-funded Schoolhouse of Americas in Fort Benning, Georgia, which has produced 60,000 graduates.)  If this were not humiliation enough, the people of South America have had to conduct the cantankerous of being branded as a people who are incapable of commonwealth -- as if coups and massacres are somehow encrypted in their genes.

This list does not of course include countries in Africa or Asia that suffered US armed services interventions -- Vietnam, Korea, Indonesia, Laos, and Kingdom of cambodia.  For how many Septembers for decades together accept millions of Asian people been bombed, burned, and slaughtered?  How many Septembers have gone past since August 1945, when hundreds of thousands of ordinary Japanese people were obliterated by the nuclear strikes in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?  For how many Septembers have the thousands who had the misfortune of surviving those strikes endured the living hell that was visited on them, their unborn children, their children'south children, on the earth, the sky, the wind, the water, and all the creatures that swim and walk and crawl and wing?

September eleven has a tragic resonance in the Centre East, too.  On September xi, 1922, ignoring Arab outrage, the British government proclaimed a mandate in Palestine, a follow-up to the 1917 Balfour declaration, which imperial Britain issued, with its regular army massed outside the gates of the city of Gaza.  The Balfour declaration promised European zionists a national home for Jewish people.  Two years after the annunciation, Lord Balfour, the British foreign secretary said: 'In Palestine nosotros practice not propose to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country.  Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-onetime traditions, in present needs, in future hopes of far profounder import than the desires or prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit this ancient state'.

How carelessly imperial power decreed whose needs were profound and whose were not.  How carelessly it vivisected ancient civilizations.  Palestine and Kashmir are imperial Britain'southward festering, blood-drenched gifts to the mod earth.  Both are fault-lines in the raging international conflicts of today.

In 1937 Winston Churchill said of the Palestinians: 'I practice not agree that the canis familiaris in a manger has the final correct to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time.  I practise not admit that correct.  I do not admit for case that a great incorrect has been washed to the carmine Indians of America or the blackness people of Australia.  I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people past the fact that a stronger race, a higher form race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their identify'.  That set the trend for the Israeli state'south attitude towards Palestinians.  In 1969, Israeli Prime number Minister Golda Meir said: 'Palestinians do not exist'.  Her successor, Prime Government minister Levi Eshkol, said: 'What are Palestinians?  When I came hither [to Palestine] there were 250,000 non-Jews, mainly Arabs and Bedouins.  It was desert, more than underdeveloped.  Null'.  Prime number Minister Menachem Begin chosen Palestinians '2-legged beasts'.  Prime number Minister Yitzhak Shamir called them 'grasshoppers' who could be crushed.  This is the language of heads of country, not the words of ordinary people.

In 1947 the Un formally partitioned Palestine and allotted 55% of Palestine's country to the zionists.  Within a year they had captured 78%.  On May 14, 1948, the state of State of israel was declared.  Minutes afterwards the declaration, the US recognized Israel.  The West Bank was annexed by Jordan.  The Gaza strip came under Egyptian military control.  Formally, Palestine ceased to be except in the minds and hearts of the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian people who became refugees.

In the summer of 1967, State of israel occupied the Westward Bank and the Gaza Strip.  Settlers were offered land subsidies and development aid to move into the occupied territories.  Near every day more Palestinian families are forced off their lands and driven into refugee camps.  Palestinians who continue to live in Israel practice not have the same rights equally Israelis and live as second-class citizens in their former homeland.

Over the decades there take been uprisings, wars, intifadas.  Tens of thousands have lost their lives.  Accords and treaties have been signed, ceasefires declared and violated.  Merely the bloodshed doesn't end.  Palestine still remains illegally occupied.  Its people alive in inhuman atmospheric condition, in virtual Bantustans, where they are subjected to collective punishments, 24-hour curfews, where they are humiliated and brutalised on a daily basis.  They never know when their homes volition be demolished, when their children will be shot, when their precious copse will be cutting, when their roads will exist closed, when they volition be allowed to walk down to the market place to buy food and medicine.  And when they will not.  They live with no semblance of dignity.  With not much hope in sight.  They have no control over their lands, their security, their motion, their advice, their h2o supply.  So when accords are signed and words like 'autonomy' and even 'statehood' are bandied near, it's always worth request: What sort of autonomy?  What sort of state?  What sort of rights volition its citizens have?  Young Palestinians who cannot incorporate their anger plow themselves into human bombs and haunt Israel's streets and public places, blowing themselves upwardly, killing ordinary people, injecting terror into daily life, and eventually hardening both societies' suspicion and mutual hatred of each other.  Each bombing invites merciless reprisals and fifty-fifty more hardship on Palestinian people.  Merely and so suicide bombing is an act of individual despair, not a revolutionary tactic.  Although Palestinian attacks strike terror into Israeli civilians, they provide the perfect encompass for the Israeli regime'southward daily incursions into Palestinian territory, the perfect excuse for former-fashioned, 19th century colonialism, dressed up every bit a new-fashioned, 21st century 'war'.

Israel's staunchest political and military ally is and always has been the US regime.  The US government has blocked, along with State of israel, almost every UN resolution that sought a peaceful, equitable solution to the conflict.  It has supported almost every war that State of israel has fought.  When Israel attacks Palestine, it is American missiles that smash through Palestinian homes.  And every year Israel receives several billion dollars from the US.

What lessons should we describe from this tragic conflict?  Is it really impossible for Jewish people who suffered and then cruelly themselves -- more than cruelly mayhap than any other people in history -- to understand the vulnerability and the yearning of those whom they have displaced?  Does farthermost suffering always kindle cruelty?  What hope does this get out the human being race with?  What will happen to the Palestinian people in the event of a victory?  When a nation without a land eventually proclaims a state, what kind of state will it be?  What horrors will be perpetrated under its flag?  Is it a separate land that nosotros should be fighting for, or the rights to a life of liberty and dignity for everyone regardless of their ethnicity or faith?

Palestine was in one case a secular bulwark in the Middle Due east.  Just at present the weak, undemocratic, past all accounts corrupt but avowedly not-sectarian PLO, is losing ground to Hamas, which espouses an overtly sectarian ideology and fights in the proper noun of Islam.  To quote from their manifesto: 'We will be its soldiers, and the firewood of its fire, which will fire the enemies'.

The world is called upon to condemn suicide bombers.  Simply can we ignore the long road they have journeyed on before they arrived at this destination?  September eleven, 1922 to September 11, 2002 -- 80 years is a long long time to have been waging war.  Is there some advice the world can give the people of Palestine?  Some chip of hope we can hold out?  Should they just settle for the crumbs that are thrown their mode and behave like the grasshoppers or two-legged beasts they've been described as?  Should they just take Golda Meir's suggestion and make a real effort to not exist?

In another office of the Eye East, September 11 strikes a more recent chord.  Information technology was on September 11, 1990 that George W Bush-league Sr, so president of the Us, made a spoken communication to a joint session of Congress announcing his government's decision to become to war against Iraq.

The US regime says that Saddam Hussein is a war criminal, a cruel military machine despot who has committed genocide against his own people.  That'due south a adequately accurate description of the human.  In 1988 he razed hundreds of villages in northern Iraq and used chemical weapons and automobile-guns to kill thousands of Kurdish people.  Today nosotros know that that aforementioned year the The states government provided him with $500m in subsidies to buy American farm products.  The next yr, after he had successfully completed his genocidal campaign, the US government doubled its subsidy to $1bn.  It also provided him with loftier quality germ seed for anthrax, besides equally helicopters and dual-use material that could be used to manufacture chemical and biological weapons.

So it turns out that while Saddam Hussein was carrying out his worst atrocities, the United states of america and the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland governments were his close allies.  Even today, the government of Turkey which has one of the most bloodcurdling human rights records in the world is one of the United states government's closest allies.  The fact that the Turkish government has oppressed and murdered Kurdish people for years has not prevented the US regime from plying Turkey with weapons and development aid.  Clearly it was not business concern for the Kurdish people that provoked President Bush'south speech to Congress.

What inverse?  In August 1990, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.  His sin was non so much that he had committed an deed of state of war, merely that he acted independently, without orders from his masters.  This brandish of independence was enough to upset the power equation in the Gulf.  And then it was decided that Saddam Hussein exist exterminated, like a pet that has outlived its owner's affection.

The starting time Allied assail on Iraq took identify in January 1991.  The world watched the prime number-fourth dimension war every bit it was played out on TV. (In India those days, you had to get to a five- star hotel lobby to sentinel CNN.)  Tens of thousands of people were killed in a month of devastating bombing.  What many do non know is that the war did not cease and so.  The initial fury simmered downward into the longest sustained air attack on a country since the Vietnam war.  Over the terminal decade American and British forces take fired thousands of missiles and bombs on Iraq.  Iraq's fields and farmlands have been shelled with 300 tons of depleted uranium.  In countries like Britain and America depleted uranium shells are test-fired into specially constructed concrete tunnels.  The radioactive residual is done off, sealed in cement and disposed off in the ocean (which is bad enough).  In Iraq it's aimed -- deliberately, with malicious intent -- at people'southward nutrient and water supply.  In their bombing sorties, the Allies specifically targeted and destroyed h2o treatment plants, fully aware of the fact that they could not exist repaired without strange aid.  In southern Iraq in that location has been a four-fold increase in cancer among children.  In the decade of economic sanctions that followed the state of war, Iraqi civilians accept been denied food, medicine, hospital equipment, ambulances, clean water -- the bones essentials.

About half a one thousand thousand Iraqi children take died as a result of the sanctions.  Of them, Madeleine Albright, and so US Ambassador to the United Nations, famously said: 'It's a very hard pick, but we call up the toll is worth information technology.' 'Moral equivalence' was the term that was used to denounce those who criticised the war on Transitional islamic state of afghanistan.  Madeleine Albright cannot exist accused of moral equivalence.  What she said was merely straightforward algebra.

A decade of bombing has not managed to dislodge Saddam Hussein, the 'Beast of Baghdad'.  Now, almost 12 years on, President George Bush Jr has ratcheted upward the rhetoric once over again.  He's proposing an all-out war whose goal is zippo brusque of a regime change.  The New York Times says that the Bush assistants is 'following a meticulously planned strategy to persuade the public, the Congress and the allies of the demand to face the threat of Saddam Hussein'.

Weapons inspectors take conflicting reports most the status of Iraq'south weapons of mass destruction, and many have said clearly that its arsenal has been dismantled and that it does not have the chapters to build one.  However, there is no confusion over the extent and range of America'due south armory of nuclear and chemic weapons.  Would the US regime welcome weapons inspectors?  Would the Uk?  Or State of israel?

What if Iraq does have a nuclear weapon, does that justify a pre-emptive U.s.a. strike?  The US has the largest armory of nuclear weapons in the globe.  It's the only land in the globe to accept really used them on civilian populations.  If the US is justified in launching a pre-emptive attack on Iraq, why, and so any nuclear ability is justified in carrying out a pre-emptive attack on whatever other.  Republic of india could attack Pakistan, or the other way around.  If the US government develops a distaste for the Indian Prime Minister, can it just 'take him out' with a pre-emptive strike?

Recently the US played an of import part in forcing Republic of india and Pakistan back from the brink of state of war.  Is it so hard for it to take its own advice?  Who is guilty of feckless moralizing?  Of preaching peace while information technology wages war?  The US, which George Bush has chosen 'the most peaceful nation on earth', has been at war with one country or another every yr for the last 50 years.

Wars are never fought for altruistic reasons.  They're usually fought for hegemony, for business.  And so of form in that location'due south the business of war.  Protecting its command of the world's oil is fundamental to US strange policy.  The US government's contempo military interventions in the Balkans and Central Asia take to practise with oil.  Hamid Karzai, the puppet president of Afghanistan installed by the Usa, is said to exist a onetime employee of Unocal, the American-based oil company.  The US government'south paranoid patrolling of the Eye East is because information technology has two-thirds of the world'south oil reserves.  Oil keeps America's engines purring sweetly.  Oil keeps the gratuitous market rolling.  Whoever controls the world's oil controls the earth's market.  And how do yous control the oil?

Nobody puts information technology more elegantly than the New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman.  In an commodity called 'Craziness Pays' he says 'the US has to brand information technology clear to Republic of iraq and U.s.a. allies that...America will use force without negotiation, hesitation or Un approval'.  His advice was well taken.  In the wars confronting Republic of iraq and Transitional islamic state of afghanistan as well as in the about daily humiliation the U.s. authorities heaps on the United nations.  In his book on globalisation, The Lexus and the Olive Tree, Friedman says: 'The hidden hand of the market place will never piece of work without a hidden fist.  McDonald'southward cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas....  And the subconscious fist that keeps the earth safe for Silicon Valley'due south technologies to flourish is called the The states Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps'.  Perhaps this was written in a moment of vulnerability, merely it's certainly the most succinct, accurate description of the project of corporate globalisation that I accept read.

Later on September 11, 2001 and the State of war Against Terror, the hidden mitt and fist have had their cover diddled, and we have a clear view now of America's other weapon -- the free marketplace -- bearing downwardly on the developing world, with a clenched unsmiling grinning.  The task that never ends is America's perfect state of war, the perfect vehicle for the endless expansion of American imperialism.  In Urdu, the word for profit is fayda.  Al-qaida means the discussion, the word of God, the law.  And so, in India some of us telephone call the State of war Confronting Terror, Al-qaida vs Al-fayda -- the discussion vs the profit (no pun intended).

For the moment it looks equally though Al-fayda volition deport the day.  Simply then you never know...

In the concluding x years of unbridled corporate globalisation, the world'southward total income has increased by an boilerplate of 2.5% a year.  And notwithstanding the numbers of the poor in the earth has increased by 100 million.  Of the tiptop hundred biggest economies, 51 are corporations, not countries.  The top 1% of the earth has the same combined income as the bottom 57% and the disparity is growing.  Now, under the spreading canopy of the War Against Terror, this procedure is being hustled along.  The men in suits are in an unseemly hurry.  While bombs pelting downwardly on us, and cruise missiles skid across the skies, while nuclear weapons are stockpiled to make the earth a safer place, contracts are being signed, patents are existence registered, oil pipelines are being laid, natural resources are being plundered, h2o is being privatised and democracies are existence undermined.

In a country like Republic of india, the 'structural adjustment' end of the corporate globalisation projection is ripping through people'southward lives.  'Development' projects, massive privatisation, and labour 'reforms' are pushing people off their lands and out of their jobs, resulting in a kind of barbaric dispossession that has few parallels in history.  Across the world every bit the 'free market place' brazenly protects Western markets and forces developing countries to lift their merchandise barriers, the poor are getting poorer and the rich richer.  Civil unrest has begun to erupt in the global village.  In countries like Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Bolivia, India the resistance movements against corporate globalisation are growing.

To contain them, governments are tightening their control.  Protestors are being labelled 'terrorists' and then dealt with as such.  Only civil unrest does non only mean marches and demonstrations and protests against globalisation.  Unfortunately, it also ways a desperate downward spiral into law-breaking and chaos and all kinds of despair and disillusionment which, equally we know from history (and from what we see unspooling before our optics), gradually becomes a fertile breeding basis for terrible things -- cultural nationalism, religious bigotry, fascism and of course, terrorism.

All these march arm-in-arm with corporate globalisation.

There is a notion gaining credence that the free market breaks down national barriers, and that corporate globalisation'due south ultimate destination is a hippie paradise where the centre is the merely passport and we all live together happily inside a John Lennon song (Imagine at that place's no country...)  This is a canard.

What the free market place undermines is not national sovereignty, simply democracy.  Equally the disparity betwixt the rich and poor grows, the hidden fist has its work cut out for it.  Multinational corporations on the prowl for 'sweetheart deals' that yield enormous profits cannot push through those deals and administer those projects in developing countries without the agile connivance of land machinery -- the constabulary, the courts, sometimes even the army.  Today corporate globalisation needs an international confederation of loyal, corrupt, preferably authoritarian governments in poorer countries, to button through unpopular reforms and quell the mutinies.  It needs a press that pretends to be gratis.  It needs courts that pretend to dispense justice.  Information technology needs nuclear bombs, standing armies, sterner immigration laws, and watchful coastal patrols to make sure that it's only money, appurtenances, patents and services that are globalised -- not the gratis movement of people, not a respect for homo rights, not international treaties on racial discrimination or chemical and nuclear weapons, or greenhouse gas emissions, climate change, or God forbid, justice.  Information technology's as though fifty-fifty a gesture towards international accountability would wreck the whole enterprise.

Shut to i twelvemonth after the War Against Terror was officially flagged off in the ruins of Afghanistan, in country after land freedoms are being curtailed in the proper noun of protecting freedom, civil liberties are being suspended in the name of protecting republic.  All kinds of dissent is being divers as 'terrorism'.  All kinds of laws are being passed to bargain with it.  Osama Bin Laden seems to have vanished into thin air.  Mullah Omar is said to accept fabricated his escape on a motor-bike.  The Taliban may have disappeared but their spirit, and their organization of summary justice is surfacing in the unlikeliest of places.  In Republic of india, in Pakistan, in Nigeria, in America, in all the Central Asian republics run past all style of despots, and of course in Afghanistan under the United states of america-backed Northern Alliance.

Meanwhile, down at the mall there'southward a mid-season sale.  Everything'south discounted -- oceans, rivers, oil, gene pools, fig wasps, flowers, childhoods, aluminum factories, phone companies, wisdom, wilderness, civil rights, ecosystems, air -- all 4,600 million years of evolution.  It's packed, sealed, tagged, valued and bachelor off the rack.  (No returns).  As for justice -- I'grand told it's on offering as well.  You tin can get the best that coin can buy.

Donald Rumsfeld said that his mission in the State of war against Terror was to persuade the world that Americans must exist immune to keep their mode of life.  When the maddened king stamps his foot, slaves tremble in their quarters.  So, standing here today, information technology'due south hard for me to say this, but the American way of life is but not sustainable.  Because it doesn't acknowledge that there is a world beyond America.

Fortunately power has a shelf life.  When the time comes, perchance this mighty empire volition, like others before it, overreach itself and implode from within.  It looks equally though structural cracks take already appeared.  As the State of war Confronting Terror casts its net wider and wider, America's corporate heart is hemorrhaging.  For all the endless empty churr most democracy, today the world is run by three of the most secretive institutions in the world: The International Monetary Fund, the Earth Bank, and the World Trade Organisation, all three of which, in plough, are dominated by the US.  Their decisions are made in underground.  The people who head them are appointed backside closed doors.  Nobody really knows annihilation about them, their politics, their behavior, their intentions.  Nobody elected them.  Nobody said they could make decisions on our behalf.  A world run past a handful of greedy bankers and CEOs who nobody elected tin can't possibly last.

Soviet-way communism failed, not because it was intrinsically evil just considering it was flawed.  It immune likewise few people to usurp as well much ability.  20-commencement century market-capitalism, American-style, will fail for the same reasons.  Both are edifices constructed by human intelligence, undone by human nature.

The time has come up, the walrus said.  Perhaps things volition get worse and then amend.  Perhaps at that place'due south a small-scale God upward in sky readying herself for u.s.a..  Another globe is not simply possible, she's on her way.  Maybe many of the states won't be here to greet her, but on a serenity day, if I listen very advisedly, I can hear her breathing.

-- Arundhati Roy

dentonbeirds.blogspot.com

Source: https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~peer/arundhatiRoy.html

Share this post